See how engineers
actually use AI.
Candidates run one command. Our agent captures everything — and distills it into the signals that matter.
spize Challenge ready. Work normally — we're watching.
✓ Session active · 1h 30m remaining
Hiring is broken.
84% of developers use AI tools. Your interviews pretend they don't.
LeetCode
Tests memorization, not engineering.
Take-homes
Tests free time. Zero visibility into process.
"No AI Allowed"
Tests a workflow nobody uses anymore.
Let them use AI. Watch how.
Three Steps
Create Assessment
Pick a repo. Set a time limit. Send the candidate a token.
Candidate Works
One command. Their tools, their workflow. Our agent observes silently in the background.
Review + Defend
We distill the session into a report. Then the candidate defends their decisions.
Signals You Can't Get Anywhere Else
We don't just record. We surface what matters.
AI Proficiency
Are they vibing — just accepting whatever comes back? Or are they orchestrating — leading the AI with intent, reviewing output, iterating on prompts?
Code Review Habits
How long between getting AI output and committing it? Did they actually read it? We surface the pauses where real engineering happens.
Security Awareness
Did they hardcode secrets? Paste sensitive data into prompts? Accept insecure AI suggestions? Find out before they're on your team.
Error Correction
When the AI hallucinated or got it wrong — did they catch it? Did they fix it? Or did they ship it?
Novel Techniques
Creative prompting strategies. Chaining tools together. Techniques you haven't seen before. The stuff that separates good from great.
Tool Selection
Which AI tools are they reaching for? When do they switch? When do they put the AI down and just code? The toolbelt tells a story.
The Defense
After coding, the candidate answers auto-generated questions about their actual decisions.